HM Revenue & Customs to review 23,000 cases after axing Concentrix contract

Written by Josh May on 6 February 2017 in News
News

HMRC confirms it will look again at tax credits withdrawn by the US contractor

HMRC has confirmed that it is reviewing 23,000 cases where tax credits were withdrawn by controversial contractor Concentrix. 

The tax authority scrapped its deal with the US firm, which was employed to cut fraud and error from the tax credit system, after it was the subject of a series of criticisms, including from MPs on the Work and Pensions Committee.

Of the 59,000 times Concentrix attempted to dock payments, 36,000 were appealed and 87% of those had their complaints upheld, the MPs said.  


HMRC not going back to private sector for tax credit checks after Concentrix row
HMRC confirms early end to Concentrix tax credits contract
Concentrix row: HMRC chief Jon Thompson hints at early end to troubled tax credits contract

 


HMRC has now told the committee that it is now looking again at the other 23,000 cases.

“HMRC will review those cases to establish that decisions made by Concentrix were properly made and communicated to claimants,” it said.

"Where absolutely necessary, we will re-contact the claimant to request further information relating to their claim. Current plans indicate that this activity could be completed by March 2017 but the scope of this work will be confirmed once an analysis of the total cost has been produced."

Frank Field, the Labour MP who chairs the Work and Pensions Committee, said the move by HMRC was "testament to the work of parliament on this issue".

He added: “HMRC was right to fire its contractor, but many of the processes used by Concentrix were the same as those used by HMRC itself. 

“In particular, the Committee welcomes the review of cases where claimants had their tax credits stopped but did not submit a formal appeal.

“For many claimants, particularly those who were unwell, lacked self-confidence or had caring responsibilities, the document-heavy process of challenging a wrong decision by Concentrix was surely prohibitively daunting. The real answer is of course to root out fraud and error at entry to the system rather than stopping benefits in payment as first resort.”

HMRC's chief executive Jon Thompson told MPs on the Public Accounts Committee last month that he had "doubts" about whether a "full payment-by-results model" was appropriate for future tax credit work, after the tax authority indicated that it not be contracting out such checks in the future.

About the author

Josh May is news editor for PoliticsHome.com, where a version of this story first appeared

Share this page

Further reading in our policy hubs

Add new comment

Comments

Anonymous (not verified)

Submitted on 6 February, 2017 - 10:16
Good news for the tax credit claimants affected by this debacle but we still need to know how such monumental mistakes were made. Are HMRC going to compensate claimants, many very vulnerable, who were caught up in it all? Many, many questions remain and its time HMRC were open about it. The respected MP Frank Field indicates the problem was with the process (the same as used by HMRC) so, despite HMRC quickly announcing they would keep the checks in-house in future, it appears HMRC did have a big role in the mistakes, and it was a role which goes much further than 'just' their apparent failure to monitor the contract.

Anon (not verified)

Submitted on 6 February, 2017 - 10:50
What staff are going to be reviewing these cases? The same ex-Concentrix staff which HMRC then employed when they terminated the Concentrix contract?

Anon (not verified)

Submitted on 6 February, 2017 - 21:06
When are HMRC Senior Management going to demonstrate a little accountability and transparency in action by telling the public how and why they - HMRC - failed to ensure the work was carried out to a quality standard? There is no point HMRC blaming Concentrix for it all. HMRC have said this work will not be put out for external contract again, and so there we have it Concentrix are no longer a concern. HMRC are the tax department responsible for this, and we need to know what lessons they are going to learn about their own poor performance.

Contact the author

The contact details for the Civil Service World editorial team are available on our About Us page.

Related Articles

Louise Casey to leave government

24 April 2017

Civil servant who led Troubled Families programme to leave Whitehall to take up roles in...

Troubled Families programme may ditch payment-by-results scheme

5 April 2017

Changes to be judged on how funding can promote sustainability of services and reduce...

Pensions triple-lock ‘should be scrapped by 2025’

23 March 2017

Cridland Review dubs guaranteed 2.5% annual rise unaffordable and calls for...

Related Sponsored Articles

Bringing government data to life
8 June 2016

Microsoft shows a few of the ways that governments can turn data into insight

BYOD: The critical balancing act
3 April 2014

How can organisations allow employees to use their own devices to access corporate information...

Mind the Gap
3 April 2014

Given the rhetoric surrounding the shift to the modern workplace and the importance of centring...